Double Refusal of Rewards

The refusal of being refused. If our keyholders were truly harsh, wouldn’t they be providing us with sexual release constantly?

Especially if you ONLY appreciated the waiting period and despised reaching an orgasm... That would be true torment! I find that contradiction interesting; I had to read it twice just to confirm my understanding!:lol:

It doesn't occur because double refusal leaves keyholders without their usual rewards.

Ok then, how about the much more likely; "I'm not going to lock you up now because it would be giving you what you want and you don't like to get what you want do you?"

:lol::lol: That's good!

So, a better way to tease would be for the keyholder to wear the cage on a chain around their neck?:roll:

> member_4e3795d05d wrote:The refusal of being refused. > If our keyholders were truly harsh, wouldn't they be providing us with sexual release constantly? Along the lines of "hit me" said the masochist, "no" said the sadist... To the original point, It all depends on exactly how you play it out as a couple. Denial is not the driver for me, it is being controlled and used as and when CQ wants. We use the device to establish control over distance as well as to ensure I understand that CQ runs our sex life, not my cock or urges. Her total control of my orgasm ensures the relationship runs well.

> member_6a2b8da741 wrote:Denial is not the driver for me, it is being controlled and used... Yeah, what he said, although as somewhat of a masochist, the frustration of forced waiting has its own eroticism, which can be further enhanced by using the desire for orgasm as a motivator to compel additional behaviors as desired by the keyholder.