YiFeng Cages: Huge Selection and Price—Are They Worth It? (ZCS020)

Right now they boast an amazing selection of 128 chastity devices listed on and 110 on . They appear to have faithfully replicated nearly every style available. There are Birdlock-style models, some resembling the Holy Trainer, plus belts and electric torture designs among others; I recognize a few but can’t name them all. It’s quite astounding. And they’re affordable, though I’m unsure if that means low quality. () I placed an order for the YiFeng Stainless Male Chastity Device Belt Restraint Bondage Fetish Urethral Tube ZCS20. Even though I won’t be using the urethral tube, I plan to update this thread with my findings. If anyone has already used this model, please share your impressions. () Ah, okay. While I haven’t located YiFeng directly on the community site yet, I wisely searched for Chinese cages here and noticed they’ve been discussed extensively. It seems likely that YiFeng isn’t a single manufacturer but rather acts as a reseller for various Chinese producers. Still, it’s interesting.

I usually stay away from hinged rings. They tend to pinch at the top and bottom and wobble around. Your experience might be better than mine.

This brings to mind my A080 device, specifically regarding how the cuff ring is made. It pinches terribly, and mine arrived with a very loose fit between its two halves. The pinch was also noticeable where those sections met the tab for the cage itself. Unless you have the skills to modify it thoroughly, this isn't a device built for long-term comfort.

> member_381064b05f wrote:This reminds me of my A080 device, at least, the way the cuff ring is manufactured. It's pinchy as hell, [...] Ah yes, it does look very similar to the A080. The differences are that mine has a shorter cage, five beads, and the urethral tube which allows you to urinate through it; however, as I mentioned before, looking down into it feels a bit daunting for me. Anyway, I wouldn't be surprised if this is from the same manufacturer. Also, the front piece is different because of that tube—the hole for peeing is quite small, and in my case, I need to align it carefully so I don't poke the tube. > member_e84ec8c43c wrote:I always avoid hinged rings. They pinch top and bottom, and they tend to wobble. Perhaps your experience will be better. It's probably too soon to judge definitively, but here are my observations so far: Putting on the YiFeng ZSC020 is a bit of an effort, similar to how I found with the CB6000s and HTv2 models I owned previously. It feels like it needs three or four hands. Initially, I tried putting the ring on without sliding the rubber over the hinge, which caused pinching. But once I carefully moved it into position at a snail's pace, that issue disappeared. For me, the ring seems slightly wobbly; if it gets worse and eventually breaks, that would be unfortunate, but for now, it’s holding up. As mentioned earlier, my scrotum is incredibly large with lots of skin, making it hard to close the top part without pinching myself. In fact, I managed to pinch several times during the process. With some help from my wife (who isn't around right now), this would have been much easier. That help also makes it simpler to keep the ring closed tightly while pulling the cage over the penis. I spent time trying to hold everything together with a piece of nylon over my cock, but couldn't quite manage it all at once. So instead, I just forced it on without the nylon, closed it up, and then adjusted the skin as best I could. I am uncut and need some protective skin coverage; otherwise, it's a nightmare for me. This worked reasonably well because I got enough skin forward, but there is still so much at the back! The first ring (part of the cage itself, not the hinged one) is covered on the left, right, and bottom by ball skin—basically everywhere except where the cage meets the ring—which might cause hygiene issues. Between that ring and the next one up, there's a small mound of cock skin. That ball skin covering the first cage ring feels somewhat uncomfortable, likely worsened by the beads. It isn't terrible yet, but it feels like it will become sore within a day or so. Overall, unlike you two, I actually quite like the hinged ring. With some practice, I think I can get it on without pinching. It is much easier and faster for me than the HT ring, where I have to thread one ball through first; once that's done, the other ball hides somewhere in my groin, taking ages to tease out and guide through the ring. That process also tends to hurt. It would be perfect if I could lock the hinged ring shut after closing it, allowing me to focus on securing the cage. I was concerned about aligning with that small front hole, but that turned out not to be an issue. My first attempt went wrong, but my second try was perfect.

These are affordable and come with two-day delivery. They sound like a dream for someone just starting to figure out what works best. You get a year's worth of testing in just one month at 20% of the cost. For people whose chastity play lasts only hours or a couple of days, this is likely a perfectly acceptable final solution. That said, I can't see these working as long-term devices unless you're very fortunate and they are made from high-quality materials (despite what the marketing says, I've found many cheap devices don't match their promises). Use them to determine your preferences before paying more for custom-made gear that fits perfectly. You'll know exactly what you're getting.

> member_e0afc0c6eb wrote:I can not imagine these working out as a long term device unless you are very lucky I actually could see them lasting longer for someone with an average build. For me, the problem remains my massive balls and scrotum; I'd prefer a larger ring and more space between the ring and the cage. But having said that, I've now worn this cage for four consecutive days (without the urethral bit). With the HT model, I never lasted more than two days before suffering pain and soreness from its cage, forcing me to take it off temporarily. Even before then, the smell used to get quite bad. Cleaning this one is much easier for me; even when I didn't shower on one of those days, it didn't develop that terrible odor I kept getting with the HT. Don't misunderstand me—this isn't perfect for my setup. It does cause some soreness because the ring is a bit small and the gap between cage and ring is tight too, but it might suffice for now. I think I'll get good value from it before presumably ordering custom metal. Or perhaps buying the Ghost model with its largest ring and gap, which has the benefit of not needing to worry about metal detectors at airports.

I bought one of these ... stity&th=1 from a different source for $18. The integral lock was initially quite tight but has loosened up after being removed several times. The edges and corners were also a bit sharp, but fine sandpaper smoothed them out. So far I've had it on for four days, and compared to my very comfortable JB model, it is surprisingly pleasant. It's a little snug in circumference when putting it on, but not uncomfortably so. The length has proven just right for me as well. They also offer a longer version of this same device. So far, this inexpensive piece seems like a good purchase; long-term wear will reveal the full story.

I bought this; ... UTF8&psc=1 It actually seems well constructed, and the lock works fine without being too messy to handle (although I wish they had opted for a more traditional locking style so you could swap out base rings). However, I have a few issues. First off, the smallest ring is still too large (I'm not even sure if it *is* the smallest ring; despite choosing that option, mine is definitely larger than my 1.5" c-ring). But the bigger problem is the weight—it's heavy. Just standing there causes the cage to slide forward until it basically hangs on my scrotum, with the head of my tool perhaps just kind of lodged in place. Some of this is due to that base ring issue I mentioned, but I think this belt either needs some sort of strap to lift it up or you need the version with the urethral tube to hold it steady. For me, since I have a PA, I unscrewed the ball at the end, pushed the barbell through the front hole, and screwed the ball back on in an attempt to secure it. It pinched too much though; doesn't work well. I've wondered before about finding some soft leather strap to wear that would hold a ball-capture device in place. The pain from excessive friction and pulling when aroused is why I fear these types of devices. Anyway, this one definitely seems suitable for my build, and the quality appears fine based on how little time I've spent wearing it so far. Perhaps if you have really tight, non-stretchy undergarments? Edit; also, the front piece seems quite large to me. Maybe that says more about my anatomy than the cage itself. When flaccid, there's a lot of empty space (cavernous). Yet its length is short enough that sensitive parts easily poke out when erect. It feels backwards to me, and this likely contributes partly to why it's so heavy. Although, the large front piece does help ensure the gap remains too small for the boys to pull through.

> member_e0afc0c6eb wrote:These are inexpensive with two day delivery. They sound like a dream come true to someone just starting to learn what works and what doesn't. A year's worth of testing and trials in a month at 20% of the cost… I’ve been wondering about something similar for quite some time. I’ve purchased both a CB6000 and a Holy Trainer 2, which really weren't functional for me at all (my glans tends to turtle easily). I thought my next step might be buying several of these low-cost devices to see what a more accurate fit feels like. Has anyone bought multiple Chinese chastity devices specifically as sizing tools before ordering custom gear? If so, did you feel that strategy worked well?