Dominant, professional or lifestyle? Get listed on the Wanted board. Post an ad
FindMistress

Can you recall the experience of wearing your initial chastity device?

My initial chastity cage was a see-through plastic model bought from Lockinkhttps:// ... e9900affbe. Advantages: 1. It was simple to put on because I didn't…

member_c83ca3a35e 27 Aug 2026 #1

My initial chastity cage was a see-through plastic model bought from Lockinkhttps:// … e9900affbe.

Advantages:

  1. It was simple to put on because I didn’t need to push my testicles inside the ring; I just wrapped the ring around them.
  2. The cage is lightweight and breathable, feeling comfortable with a pleasant angle for the penis.
  3. With an embedded lock, there’s no risk of it colliding with the cage, preventing awkward moments.

Disadvantages:

  1. The lock felt somewhat loose and seemed ready to fall out, although this never actually occurred.
  2. Achieving erections during sleep was difficult. Image
member_c15823c046 28 Aug 2026 #2

LOL My inaugural device was homemade: six rings welded together by short rods between them, with a smaller ring at the end and a larger cut ring that acted as a hinge. Tabs on top allowed for insertion of the lock. It was terrible! LOL—highly functional but poorly sized and couldn't be worn long. The first one I purchased was an original CB_3000: a plastic cage with a hinged round base ring. I loved it immediately, especially how it looked when aroused, resembling canned ham squeezed into the tube. I tried to find a picture of it, but its design seems to have changed since then. PROS: Loved the feel; once adjusted correctly, I wore it 24/7. Great fit Urination was easy (though I didn't realize this could be an issue until later with other units) Easy to clean using a directed spray in the shower Pleasant sensations and visuals when aroused Con: The only wearable problem was that the hinge point on the base ring would pinch unexpectedly. The Base Rings eventually broke, all of them. My last attempt used the largest ring which was too big, so I added tubing over it to tighten it somewhat, but it still snapped. Mikel

member_e33d73df19 28 Aug 2026 #3

The curve. It’s a bloody huge thing. The fit is perfect, yet I had endless night issues and struggled to hide it in my pants. Walking caused the lock to bang against the cage like a child's drum.

member_cc31bf4706 29 Aug 2026 #4

> Mr Pickle wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2024 8:37 pm > The curve. Bloody stupid big thing. > Fit like a glove, endless problems at night and try hiding that thing in your pants. > The lock banging the cage when walking was like a child's drum. That brought a smile to my face. It reminds me of my (short) experience with the 6000S. ***So*** bulky and, yes, the lock clunking away unless held by certain underwear.

member_c5a7c75d7b 30 Aug 2026 #5

I also bought the Curve as my initial device, and there were benefits. I could experiment with different ring sizes and gaps. Also, I learned that a 1 1/2" inside diameter tube fits me perfectly. Most devices have an ID of 1 3/8", and that eighth of an inch makes a big difference for me. Additionally, it made me realize that the length of the tube/cage is only part of the device's total length, which includes the gap plus the width of the base ring. The Curve allows partial nocturnal erections to happen downward due to the tube shape. This feels very different from a properly fitting device that stops ereptions early on. A masochistic side enjoys having my erections forced down, so I still have a Curve that I occasionally sleep in. On reflection, there were more pluses than minuses with the Curve as a first device. After all, what are the odds of getting a perfect device right away?

member_34b8fba38c 30 Aug 2026 #6

I agree that trying multiple ring and spacer size combinations is beneficial. That’s exactly what we did during our brief trial of the CB6000S. We won’t go back to it, but those experiments were useful.

member_1f353e1d87 31 Aug 2026 #7

> mikel2411 wrote: ↑Tue May 14, 2024 10:44 am > Base Rings ALL of them eventually broke, last try was largest ring that was TOO big so I put tubing over it to tighten it up some and it still broke. Ah yes, the breaky base rings. I 'repaired' two of them with JB Weld, making them solid with more surface area and an internal diameter of 40mm. They now fit fairly well and are much more comfortable. Mine is +20 years old and (so far) the only one I have.

member_148fec17b9 31 Aug 2026 #8

my first is cb6000

member_a411e172d0 1 Sept 2026 #9

Yeah, my first was the original CB-2000.... quite a torture device compared to our current ones. I also had the CB-3000 which improved things but not by much.

member_d753b6132f 1 Sept 2026 #10

I certainly do. It was a CB3000S

member_ba19d2296a 2 Sept 2026 #11

It’s interesting how many seem to begin with a plastic CB-style cage. I had an off-brand cb6000, then a smaller version. Like others found they were hard to hide and keep clean, and that clanking lock really annoyed me. The move to steel was eye-opening, as well the trend toward increasingly smaller cages. Now I have three steel ones of different sizes, all much smaller than what sellers' websites recommend, and capable of long-term wear.

member_1f9bfbb908 3 Sept 2026 #12

Uncomfortable

member_541c83795a 3 Sept 2026 #13

An evotion bijou printed model with an open tip secured through the PA. It is still the only one I own now, though it will be replaced.

member_aee7dc7aee 4 Sept 2026 #14

Large plastic thing that broke and was rubbish

member_cc31bf4706 4 Sept 2026 #15

> Spaceman wrote: ↑Mon Sep 23, 2024 1:02 am > Interesting how many seem to start in a CB type plastic cage. I had a knock off cb6000, then a smaller version. Like others found they were hard to hide, hard to keep clean and that lock clunking really annoyed me. > The move to steel was a revelation, as was the move to smaller and smaller cages. Now I have three steel ones of different sizes, all much smaller that the sellers websites recomendations and all capable of long term wear. It is something of a recurring theme, isn't it? Why do so many of us, me included, start off thinking that the clunky old CB range is the way to go? Somehow that range has been successful in becoming a best seller even though many of us discover that it's no so great after all. Is it simply good marketing maybe? I think part of it is not so good marketing on the part of the other products. Poor descriptions and lack of guidance on measuring etc. added to the mistaken belief that those small/tiny cages are just too ridiculously small to be of any real use. "How could I ever get into that?" doesn't sound like a stupid question when a newby looks at his willy alongside a picture of cage no bigger than a small conker. The revelation on moving to steel and smaller cages, and then much smaller cages is astonishing. "Yes, it does fit in those things after all and what's more, it's more comfortable." it's strange. It's incredible. But it's true! When the Cobra Nano or Nub was suggested for me as a replacement for the next to useless CB6000S, I thought it couldn't possibly work but it turned out to be one of the best fitting and comfortable cages of all. And effective too. One missing piece of information on all of the websites selling these things seems to be that "smaller is better". Yes, you really do need a cage that's shorter than your cock, as counter-intuitive sounds. The makers of the CB range don't tell you that of course. But neither do the sellers of the other options promote that aspect and many don't even offer advice in that direction. Sexy words about how you will be humiliated seeing your miserable cock locked up but little practical help on how to measure and what you actually need. Like you I've got 3 steel cages (all from House of Denial) that are all short and small in my opinion (much smaller than the CB6000S) plus the Cobra Nub, which is the smallest of the Cobras as far as I know. We call the biggest of the steel cages the 'big' one (keyholder instructions) but it's still shorter than my flaccid penis. Easy to keep clean, no clanky padlock, unobtrusive and comfortable to wear. In fact I'm wearing the 'big' one now and I can forget it's even there most of the time. When I get reminders then there's definitely no doubt that it's there of course.

member_3c8283a995 5 Sept 2026 #16

My first was a creative application of parts found in the plumbing section of my local DIY store. It was followed by the CB series until I got my first custom SS cage from Steelworx.

member_30ec761844 5 Sept 2026 #17

My first cage was a black one called something like "lockdown". It came with various ring sizes and encased most of my penis. Getting the dick in was a bit tricky because it was slightly too thin for mine, so I had to use plastic foil to pull it through. Overall, though, it was a good first cage that hid well under my pants, allowing me to take it to campus without worrying about anyone noticing.

member_0b2dc66918 6 Sept 2026 #18

My first was a HT v2, the smallest size available at the time. Looking back, it was still too big for me. I recall the odd feeling of not sensing my touch inside the translucent resin casing. But it gave me severe ball burn and was easy to remove. Also, being uncut meant hygiene became messy. Anyway, it served as our starting point.

member_0630007903 7 Sept 2026 #19

My first was a CB6K too. It wasn’t a bad initial device—the multiple ring sizes and spacers were really helpful. Over time I dropped several ring sizes as my body adapted. I started with the standard size but realized it was too big, causing discomfort when sitting because the cage tip would hit the chair and push up on everything. Getting the S version made things much more comfortable. Of course, the downside is that they kept breaking. I broke and repaired several base rings. The final straw came during a tease session with my wife when I split the cage itself. It pinched like hell afterward. I ordered an MM custom Queen's Keep after that, which has been my standard cage for over a decade now. I’ve tried others in between, but the QK is the most comfortable.

member_408275df88 7 Sept 2026 #20

CB6000

member_af406dc1bc 8 Sept 2026 #21

My first cage was a Chinese CB6000 knock-off from AliExpress. It was far too big and made of poor quality materials; the ring broke after just a few days. But it didn’t discourage me. After some trials and errors, I found a much better model.

member_eaa1426311 9 Sept 2026 #22

Like many others, mine was also a CB6000 about 8-9 years ago. I had no inkling of the chastity lifestyle; I saw the CB while browsing for new items in the bondage toy realm. The CB600# were pretty common on BDSM sites, which is one reason, IMO, why so many people start with them. We enjoyed using the CB, though its limitations became apparent quickly. After a fairly short time of use, we had a very fortunate break—literally. One night I woke up and felt something odd about the CB but couldn’t place it. In the morning, I saw that it had split down the long seam. I went downstairs for coffee carrying the broken device and showed it to my wife. She replied “it seems like someone would make one that is safer and won’t break”. That idea never occurred to us before! So I started searching online for chastity cages….and fell right into the rabbit hole! She was very happy learning about steel cages, and within a week we placed an order with Mature Metal.