Dominant, professional or lifestyle? Get listed on the Wanted board. Post an ad
FindMistress

Chastity device reviews discussion

Hi everyone. While I was away from The Mansion for a while, I found a site talking about the Spring 2015 versions of the Holy Trainer V2S. I've been wanting…

member_29f66e96ba 4 Sept 2026 #1

Hi everyone. While I was away from The Mansion for a while, I found a site talking about the Spring 2015 versions of the Holy Trainer V2S. I’ve been wanting to upgrade from my CB-6000s for ages now, mostly because it hardly ever comes off anymore. Custom metal is pricey AND most models seem too “open,” which knowing me would cause issues. That said, my CB6000s does the job (and unlike what others say I can’t pull out…as soon as thoughts turn impure the device clamps down on me) BUT it keeps splitting (I’ve reinforced mine with a zip tie) and when flaccid it’s about 1/2” too long, making it tricky to line up my tip with the hole sometimes. Zero growth capacity would be great there, but like many parts of this lifestyle, I might regret wishing for it. Soooooooo, here is my question…have any former CB6000S users switched to the HolyTrainerV2SMALL and found it shorter and tighter? If so, a little or a lot? I know it’s narrower but I can’t seem to find anyone who answers this definitively. I am soooo close to buying one here, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks. allaboutHer

member_494618e3e8 4 Sept 2026 #2

Hi there, I just made the exact same swap you're considering. Although I've only worn the ht2 for one day and night, I'll try to answer your question, but please remember my experience is still fresh! I was similar to you regarding excess space in the cb device, maybe slightly more at times, and I have no trouble pulling out of either device, which would be true for any ball trap device for me. Not going into too much detail, I have a fairly large scrotum coupled with being a grower, so I'm sure you can see my issue, though the bit between my ears keeps me in when calm, and the device works perfectly when aroused. So far, I've found the ht2 to fit much better. I have 0 growing room but am always positioned correctly for urination, although it doesn't feel any more confining; I just don't get the sensations I used to while moving around in the cb. It is also much more comfortable when sleeping and generally during the day. I found the middle ring on the cb was a nice fit, and with the ht2 I am using the 40mm ring, which fits nicely too without circulation problems so far even when aroused. Finally, the ht2 has a much smaller, neater profile; my keyholder prefers the "cute neat look" (her words) and there is no padlock digging into her during hugs etc. I find it hangs flatter and lower as your penis nestles between your balls, though this does make the whole package appear smaller. I hope that helps! If you need more info, I will try to assist.

member_29f66e96ba 5 Sept 2026 #3

Thank you for the reply and insight. Any further thoughts? Anyone else have something to add??? All input is appreciated. allaboutHer

member_21ab84baf1 5 Sept 2026 #4

I cannot comment on size as I cannot use the small model, but comparing standard sizes I would agree with stockinglover's post. The HT2 is a bit smaller and the whole device is generally quite comfortable. As I am also somewhat of a grower, I could pull out of any of the multitude of devices if I wanted to, but I do not. If I did, however, getting back into the HT2 might be difficult due to its more complex join. The internal lock is a huge advantage and it makes for a neat package. I find the gap between the cage and the ring too large, though I may try a smaller ring; so far, I have not been able to use anything less than 50 mm. From your description, it might well be ideal for you. But there is never a guarantee with these devices. I wore mine off and on for three months and would still be using it if Miss had not mislaid the key. I expect she will find them, and then I will try a smaller ring. My device definitely showed no signs of splitting etc., but did wear around the linking track between the ring and the cage; however, I have broken most of the Cb range over the years including the curve model, so I think it's pretty good.

member_494618e3e8 6 Sept 2026 #5

Hi quick update: I'm using the ht2 during the day as it has a much nicer profile under clothes and no padlock to dig into my key holder during hugs! But for nighttime I am back with the cb 6000, effectively one ring size larger. This is the best combo for comfort and constant use that I have found, providing good times every day to keep everything spotless down there.

member_29f66e96ba 6 Sept 2026 #6

Thank you for reporting back stockinglover...to clarify...so a simple yes or no---Is the HTv2S shorter than the CB6Ks? allaboutHer

member_3f97b6b090 7 Sept 2026 #7

It is a different shape so that's difficult to answer. Having used both, I'd say the HT2S is a tiny bit shorter, but way, way more comfortable. -droog

member_494618e3e8 7 Sept 2026 #8

I would say cage length is almost the same but the ht didn't have the large head or quite the diameter of the cb so it's a little smaller. The main difference is the position of the cage and ring: in the CB, the cage starts in front of the ring; with the ht, it actually starts behind the front part of the ring. When I get home I will take a photo.

member_23cd00e7fb 8 Sept 2026 #9

I've switched from the cb6000s to the HTV2 (spring model). I would say I find it slightly smaller visually but it seems smaller to wear and controls swelling better. I think this is because the shape of the HT is different to the CB, and my 'shape' (not necessarily just width or length) fits it better than the cb does, making me find it much more comfortable. As far as 'escaping' is concerned, after finding the best combination for me in the CBs, I don't pull out of either that one or the HT (although I do find the HT harder to get on). The wife prefers the HT because it doesn't have so many bits. Don't know if this helps you. I suppose I'm saying it fits me better and feels smaller, but maybe dependent on shape.

member_342f1c4bb2 8 Sept 2026 #10

Can't compare the CB6000s with the HTv2 small, but I changed from a CB3000 to an HTv2 standard and now since Oct 15th to an HTv2 small. I'm locked in it 24/7 (besides some cleaning) and must say I like the HTv2 much better than the CB3000. I find the small HTv2 even a better fit for me than the HTv2 Standard, which surprised me as the CB3000 did not need to be any smaller for me; I could not stand it. The big difference for me is the comfort of the ring in the HTv2: it still wakes me up most times, but less frequently and certainly less painfully than the CB3000. As far as I'm concerned, I believe changing from standard to small tube was the best decision. Happily locked in HTv2 for 165 days today. Good luck!

member_29f66e96ba 9 Sept 2026 #11

Hello All. Thanks so much for all of the input. I am sure many of you can appreciate not wanting to spend money on devices and being disappointed. I plan to consider all of your feedback and make my decision soon....the old CB6KS is on borrowed time...yet another break and repair!!! allaboutHer