CB Range discussion

Greetings everyone,

I design and manufacture a plastic lock specifically for the cbxxxx line of chastity devices, though I have no direct connection to the original creators.

This unit is safe for airport security checks, won’t rattle around, can be used again, has its own unique keying system, resists tampering, and sits very low profile (it’s a 7/16-inch cylinder standing about half an inch high), making it more subtle than a traditional padlock. It works with both the circular pins found on cb3000/2000 models and the rectangular ones on the cb6000.

I believe this offers a superior alternative to either standard padlocks or disposable plastic locks, but I’d appreciate some feedback from others. To spread the word, I want to give away free units to several people; all you have to do is write an honest review of it here on these forums (or elsewhere).

Please message me if you’re interested. I will select the first three or four respondents and share my address with them. You just need to send back a S.A.S.E. (a standard envelope addressed to yourself with a first-class stamp), which I’ll use to mail your lock.

Currently, these are available via where you can see photos of the product there.

Apologies for any confusion regarding this forum’s messaging system; I’ve already mislaid my initial few messages. It seems that once opened, if I don’t respond right away, they disappear.

Reach me directly at

For those whose messages may have vanished, if I recognize your name in the queue, I’ll bump you up.

Direct Link for anyone too lazy to scroll! I would really enjoy trying this; the concept looks excellent. As is often my case, I'm on the wrong side of the ocean!

Apologies for any confusion regarding this forum's messaging system; I've already mislaid my initial few messages. It seems that once opened, if I don't respond right away, they disappear. Reach me directly at For those whose messages may have vanished, if I recognize your name in the queue, I'll bump you up.

Mistress Watchful, I am actively looking for a U.K. distributor for these items. Any recommendations?

I've actually been using this **lock** for several weeks now. So far I'm very pleased with it. However, I did find that I needed to use the next size up center rod for it to function properly. It's quite simple to attach, though retrieving the small plastic **key** requires a bit of effort. Most people aren't in my specific situation, so they likely won't face this issue. This leads me to ask: can the "**key**" be adapted to fit a standard hex head wrench, just in case we lose it? Overall, I'd recommend this product. It's compact and doesn't rattle. I travel through airport security with my CB regularly now and feel much more secure wearing this small **lock**. JB

Happy to hear you like it! Now, making it a standard hex **key** would somewhat defeat the purpose, wouldn't it? The way I do it is by regularly altering the contour of both the **key** and the lock pin, ensuring that only the specific **key** provided works.

I'd love to test one of these **lock**es...it would definitely reduce my anxiety when passing through metal detectors

I'd love to test one of these **lock**es...it would definitely reduce my anxiety when passing through metal detectors

**Review of new lock design** AZ has sent me the newly designed **lock**. As promised, here are a few thoughts: * Because I was only able to test ONE unit, I can't be entirely sure what is meant by "uniquely keyed". This will matter to those tempted to simply break the current one and swap in another. * True to its description, this **lock** strikes an excellent balance between a metal **padlock** and a numbered seal. If you enjoy having your keyholder physically hold a "**key**", then this is a definite upgrade over the numbered seal. * The unit has a low profile (less bulky) and operates silently. This is a major benefit for CB6kS users who dislike how standard **padlock**es don't sit flat against the tube. * If your main goal is to detect "tampering" with your device, the numbered seal remains the top choice. * I highly recommend trying one of these if you are unhappy with metal **padlock**es and numbered seals. It may not suit everyone, but it's a reasonably priced item for experimentation. David > azsub1 said: > Greetings everyone, > > I design and manufacture a plastic lock specifically for the cbxxxx line of chastity devices, though I have no direct connection to the original creators. > > This unit is safe for airport security checks, won't rattle around, can be used again, has its own unique keying system, resists tampering, and sits very low profile (it's a 7/16-inch cylinder standing about half an inch high), making it more subtle than a traditional padlock. It works with both the circular pins found on cb3000/2000 models and the rectangular ones on the cb6000. > > I believe this offers a superior alternative to either standard **padlock**es or disposable plastic locks, but I'd appreciate some feedback from others. To spread the word, I want to give away free units to several people; all you have to do is write an honest review of it here on these forums (or elsewhere). > > Please message me if you're interested. I will select the first three or four respondents and share my address with them. You just need to send back a S.A.S.E. (a standard envelope addressed to yourself with a first-class stamp), which I'll use to mail your **lock**. > > Currently, these are available via where you can see photos of the product there. > > Apologies for any confusion regarding this forum's messaging system; I've already mislaid my initial few messages. It seems that once opened, if I don't respond right away, they disappear. > > Reach me directly at > > For those whose messages may have vanished, if I recognize your name in the queue, I'll bump you up. > Click to expand...

> davidphd1866 said: > > **Review of new lock design** > AZ has sent me the newly designed **lock**. As promised, here are a few thoughts: > * Because I was only able to test ONE unit, I can't be entirely sure what is meant by "uniquely keyed". This will matter to those tempted to simply break the current one and swap in another. > * True to its description, this **lock** strikes an excellent balance between a metal padlock and a numbered seal. If you enjoy having your keyholder physically hold a "key", then this is a definite upgrade over the numbered seal. > * The unit has a low profile (less bulky) and operates silently. This is a major benefit for CB6kS users who dislike how standard **padlock**es don't sit flat against the tube. > * If your main goal is to detect "tampering" with your device, the numbered seal remains the top choice. > * I highly recommend trying one of these if you are unhappy with metal **padlock**es and numbered seals. It may not suit everyone, but it's a reasonably priced item for experimentation. > > David > Click to expand... Thanks for the review. To clarify, when I say "uniquely keyed" I mean that I regularly alter the dimensions of the mating contours. So if you decide to simply replace just the **lock**, you must also replace the **key** because the new one might fit noticeably looser, spin free, or not fit at all.

**Thanks AZ for clarification** > azsub1 said: > > Thanks for the review. > To clarify, when I say "uniquely keyed" I mean that I regularly alter the dimensions of the mating contours. > So if you decide to simply replace just the **lock**, you must also replace the key because the new one might fit noticeably looser, spin free, or not fit at all. > > Click to expand... Should you update the style so that it is unique--at least regarding two or three used in rotation, this **lock** will be a valuable addition to security options. I urge others to check out this alternative; it possesses some excellent qualities. David

I just got these as well... I really love the concept BUT... It's useless for security...! Sorry to offer negative feedback - But honestly it is a fantastic idea - Just poorly executed. The issue is that you can insert something there to spin the pin around and escape, then easily put it back in. Since one can also pick a standard **padlock**, I'm leaning toward using numbered tags instead. That remains the only way your keyholder gets proof that you haven't been free - The drawback is that you can get out if you want to be. Does anyone know of a more secure locking system?